Volume 6, Issue 2, December 2018, Page: 32-52
Quantum Interactions of Small-Sized Neurotransmitters and of Entangled Ionotropic Receptors Accentuate the Impact of Entanglement to Consciousness
Paul Levi, Institute for Parallel and Distributed Systems (IPVS), Faculty for Informatics, Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Received: Oct. 11, 2018;       Accepted: Nov. 21, 2018;       Published: Dec. 18, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ejb.20180602.12      View  45      Downloads  9
This contribution concentrates on the evaluation of quantum processes in the brain that essentially contribute to the protection and activation of entanglement and their impact to consciousness. The corresponding calculations occur in the Fock space that represents discrete quantum fields, where the corresponding computations occur in the following succession. First, three possible weak interactions of emitted, small-sized neurotransmitters are described. These interdependencies are the attraction by electric dipole-dipole interaction, the attraction by the Morse potential and the repulsion characterized by s-wave scattering. Second, this article focus on ionotropic receptors that are embedded in a dense non-rigid grid. Anharmonic oscillators approximate these molecules, where their interactions cause grid vibrations. The determination of the expectation values of the total energy of the oscillating receptors, situated in two entangled ground states, demonstrate the existence of gap functions that shield the entanglement. This protected entanglement represents a bridge to the materialistic consciousness, and as well it refutes the dominant criticism against the quantum processes in the brain that decoherence destroys in picoseconds the entanglement (quantum coherence). The entangled entropy of the protected entangled states is not zero; what is a clear sign of entanglement. Third, consciousness activates the protected entanglement that reveals distinct positive effects, concerning the acquisition of information. Thus, the working space (associative cortices) that operates in a conscious state instantly gets compressed information on the current particular states of the cortical and subcortical components. Thereby, the emergence of consciousness is a synergetic process, which is created by the mutual interdependencies (causal circularity) of the components of the working space (synergetic agents) and the subcortical areas (synergetic “slaves”).
Interactions of Neurotransmitters, Vibrations of Ionotropic Receptors, Protected Entanglement, Consciousness, Synergetics
To cite this article
Paul Levi, Quantum Interactions of Small-Sized Neurotransmitters and of Entangled Ionotropic Receptors Accentuate the Impact of Entanglement to Consciousness, European Journal of Biophysics. Vol. 6, No. 2, 2018, pp. 32-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20180602.12
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fröhlich H (1986). Coherent excitations in active biological systems. In: Gutmann F, Keyzer H. Modern biolectro–chemistry. New York, Plenum Press.
Reimers J, McKemmish. McKenzie R; Mark A, Noel S (2009). Weak, strong, and coherent regimes of Fröhlich condensation and their applications to terahertz medicine and quantum consciousness. PNAS 106 (11), 4219 – 4224.
Beck F, Eccles A J (1992). Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol 89, 11357 – 11361.
Bear M F, Connors B W, Paradiso M A (2016). Neuroscience, Exploring the Brain. Fourth edition, Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer.
Kandel E R, Schwartz J H (2013). Principals of Neural Science. Fifth edition, New York, McGraw-Hill.
Penrose R (1995). Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hameroff S (2008). That’s life! The geometry of π electron resonance clouds. IN: Abbott D, Davies P, Pati A (2010). Quantum aspects of life. World Scientific. 403 – 434.
Tegmark M (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Phys. Rev. E. 61 (4), 4194 – 4206, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4194.
Lodish H, Berk A et al. (2016). Molecular Cell Biology. Fifth edition, New York, Freeman and Company.
Kittel Ch (2004). Introduction to Solid State Physics. Eighth edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Haken H (2003). Quantum Field Theory of Solids. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Leggett A J. (1975). A theoretical Description of the new Phases of liquid 3He. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (2): 331 – 414.
Cooper L, N (1956). Bound Electron Pairs in a degenerate Fermi Gas. Phys. Rev., Vol. 104, No.4, 1189 – 1190.
Bardeen J, Cooper L N, and Schrieffer J P (1957). Theory of Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Vol. 108, No. 5, 1175 – 1203.
Gerstner G, Kistler W (2002). Spiking Neuron Models. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Alberts B et al. (2002). Molecular Biology of the Cell. Fifth edition, New York, Garland Science.
Levi P (2016). A Quantum Field Based approach to describe the Global Molecular Dynamics of Neurotransmitter Cycles. European Journal of Biophysics, Vol. 4, No. 4, 22-41, doi: 1011648/j.ejb.20160404.11.
Levi P (2017). Quantum Effects in Synaptic Neurons and Their Networks in the Brain. European Journal of Biophysics. Vol. 4, No. 6, 42-61, doi: 10.11648/j.ejb20160406.11.
Khanna F C, Malbouisson A P, Malbouisson J M, Santana A E (2009). Thermal Quantum Field Theory. Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co.
Haken H (2006). Information and Self-Organization. Third edition. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Dehaene S (2014). Consciousness and the Brain. New York, Viking Penguin.
Weinberg S (2005). The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I-III. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Fock V A (1932). Konfigurationsraum und Zweite Quantelung. Z. Phys. 75, 622-647.
Weinberg S (2013). Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, University Press.
Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1924). On the Determination of Molecular Fields, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 106 (738), 463 – 477.
Glaum K (2007). Bose-Einstein Kondensation in endlichen Systemen. Dissertation, Institute für Theoretische Physik, Freie Universität Berlin.
Negele J W, Orland H (1988). Quantum Many-Particle Systems. New York, Addison-Wesley.
Haken H, Wolf H Ch (2004). Molecular Physics and Elements of Quantum Chemistry, Introduction to Experiments and Theory. Second edition, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Gerstner W, Kistler M, Naud R and Paninski L (2014). Neural Dynamics, from single Neurons to Networks and Models of Cognition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Haken H, Wolf H Ch (1994). The Physics of Atoms and Quanta. Fourth edition, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Atkins P. W. (1975), Quanta. A Handbook of Concepts. Second edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Messiah, A. (1969). Quantum Mechanics. Vol. I - II. Fifth printing, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Jackson J D (1975). Classical Electrodynamics. Second edition, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Morse P M (1929). Diatomic Molecules according to the Wave Mechanics. II Vibrational Levels. Phys. Rev. 34, 57-64.
Wybourne B G (1974). Classical Groups for Physicists. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Fermi E (1936). Motion of Neutrons in hydrogenous Substances. Ricerca Scientifica, 7, 13 - 52.
Born M (1927). Physical aspects of quantum mechanics. Nature 119, 354 – 357.
Lippmann B., Schwinger J (1950). Variational Principles for Scattering Processes. Phys. Rev. 79, 469-480, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.79.469.
Ehrenreich H, Cohen M H (1959). Self-Consistent Field Approach to the Many-Electron Problem. Phys. Rev., Vol. 115, Iss. 4.785 – 790.
Mermin N D (2007). Quantum Computer Science-An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bohm D (1951). Quantum Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Bell S (1964). On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox,” Physics 1, 195 – 201 (1964). In: Wheeler, J A, Zurek W (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 – 780, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
Schrödinger E (1935). Die gegenwärtige Situation der Quantenmechanik. In; Bauman K, Sexl R U (1984). Die Deutung der Quantentheorie. Wiesbaden, Vieweg Verlag.
Feynman R P, Hibbs A R (2005). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integral. Emended edition, New York, Dover Publications, Inc.
Zureck W H (1981). Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into what Mixture does the Wave Packet Collapse? Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516 – 1525.
Bohr N (1928). Quantum Mechanics and Philosophy – Causality and Complementary. In N. Bohr, Essays 1958 – 1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York, Interscience Publisher (1963).
v. Neumann J (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton NJ, University Press.
Zeh H D (1970). On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory, Foundation of Physics, Vol. 1, 69 – 76.
Joos E, Zeh H D (1985), The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment, Zeitschrift für Physik B 59 (2), 223 – 243.
Everett H (1957). Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 – 462.
Greenberger D, Horne M, Shimon A, Zeilinger A (1990). Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58 (12), 1131 – 1143.
Hartree D R (1957). The calculation of Atomic Structures. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Schwarzkopf D. S. (2014). We should have seen this coming. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8, Opinion Article 332, 1 – 3. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00332.
Roth G, Strüber N (2014). Wie das Gehirn die Seele macht. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.
Zeilinger A (2005). Einsteins Schleier. Die neue Welt der Quantenphysik. München, Goldmann Verlag.
Haken H, Levi P (2012). Synergetic Agents. Weinheim, Germany, Wiley-VCH Verlag.
Wiggins S (1990). Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Browse journals by subject